Mahalo Governor Green for the “Mr. Hooser…” shout-out on SB933CD1!

SB933CD1 is a “twofer” when it comes to violating Article III of the Hawai‘i State Constitution which says “legislative committee meetings held for the purpose of making decision on matters referred to the committee shall be open to the public”.

Signed into law on July 9, 2025 SB933CD1 was conceived, negotiated, and decided upon in private by a legislative committee without any public notice, review or input, AND it establishes a separate 4 person legislative committee tasked with giving out $50,000,000 to private non-profits, while exempting that new legislative committee from requirements to conduct its activities in public.

I wrote about SB933CD1 previously (A travesty of process and policy).

Today, I’d like to thank Governor Green for the “shout out” during his press conference commemorating the signing and passage into law of SB933CD1.

Yes, absolutely I’m seeking to shine a spotlight on the extreme deficiencies of this new law (to paraphrase from the remarks offered at the press conference.)

His remarks during the Q&A portion of the press conference, have both motivated me personally to push even harder on this issue AND elevated public awareness of the “constitutional deficiencies” contained within SB933CD1 (as mentioned by Representative Della Bellati in the Honolulu StarAdvertiser).

Hawai‘i Public Radio has also reported on the constitutional concerns, as has Kevin Dayton at Civil Beat who wrote “Lawmakers’ Plan To Give $50M To Nonprofits May Be Unconstitutional”, an excellent piece explaining a complicated process in easy to understand terms. AND also featured in Civil Beat today is Judith Wong, president of the League of Women Voters of Hawai‘i who writes this thoughtful piece “Bill For Hawaiʻi Nonprofit Grants Lacks Transparency”.

Mahalo Gov!

The Governor’s remarks at the press conference, and those of Senator Troy Hashimoto and Representative Daniel Holt (both members of the SB933CD1 Conference Committee), further confirmed that the discussions, deliberation, negotiations, and resulting decisions made by the Conference Committee, were all done in private – contrary to Article III of the Hawai‘i State Constitution.

Representative Holt a House Conferee said, SB933 ”was a difficult process…it did take some creativity at the end”.

Senator Hashimoto, Chair of the Senate Conference Committee said, SB933 “was given to me at the very end of the session to help negotiate…many people were involved in the discussions. The LG was doing a lot of negotiations…to make sure we can legally do this …the bill will follow HRS42F (pertaining to grants) in spirit…”

Note: Words matter. To say the bill will follow the law “in spirit” raises additional red flags…as does referencing negotiations “to make sure we can legally do this”…

There appear to be several serious legal problems with SB933CD1 including legal prohibitions on the “gut and replace” legislative practice and the separation of power between the executive and legislative branches of government.

Most importantly, Article III of the State Constitution says unambiguously “Every meeting of a committee in either house or of a committee comprised of a member or members from both houses held for the purpose of making decision on matters referred to the committee shall be open to the public.”

Clearly, these two legislators (both of whom were conference committee members), met in private with each other and others (either virtually or in person) for the purpose of making a decision on SB933 which was referred to their conference committee.

Both of these legislators and the governor alluded during the press conference to numerous meetings that were conducted as the group worked toward building a consensus and coming to their final decision.

None of these conversations occurred at a properly noticed, public committee hearing/meeting.

The public was never provided a copy of the proposed SB933CD1, never allowed to ask questions, and never allowed to testify on the measure.

Bottom line: The decision-making conducted during the creation and ultimate committee approval of SB933CD1 falls far short of Article III of the Hawai‘i State Constitution AND the proposed 4 member legislative committee (being formed to give away $50,000,000) also must comply with this constitutional mandate.

Watch on FB and Insta the actual “bill signing press conference” for SB933CD1.

It’s eerily similar to press conferences held almost daily by the President.

The script goes something like this:

The President/Governor announces some new bright and shiny action (the signing of SB933CD1), a member of the press in attendance asks a potentially controversial question (about a possible violation of the constitution), the Governor/President explodes in a petulant tirade against the person (yours truly) perceived to be responsible for exposing the problem – and of course the Governor/President never addresses the actual question or concerns raised.

Watch the press conference please and decide for yourself.

To paraphrase Hamlet by William Shakespeare.
“Me thinks, he doth protest too much”

Gary Hooser
Yes…former State Senator and Majority Leader…so I have a little bit of experience with this stuff…but do not remember it being this bad when I was there 2002 – 2010.

Unknown's avatar

About garyhooser

This blog represents my thoughts as an individual person and does not represent the official position of any organization I may be affiliated with. I presently serve as volunteer President of the Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action (H.A.P.A.) www.hapahi.org I am the former Vice-Chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii. In another past life, I was an elected member of the Kauai County Council, a Hawaii State Senator, and Majority Leader, and the Director of Environmental Quality Control for the State of Hawaii - in an even earlier incarnation I was an entrepreneur and small business owner. Yes, I am one of the luckiest guys on the planet. Please visit my website AND sign up for my newsletter (unlike any email newsletter you have ever gotten, of that I am sure) - http://www.garyhooser.com/#four “Come to the edge.” “We can’t. We’re afraid.” “Come to the edge.” “We can’t. We will fall!” “Come to the edge.” And they came. And he pushed them. And they flew. - Christopher Logue (b.1926)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Mahalo Governor Green for the “Mr. Hooser…” shout-out on SB933CD1!

  1. Way to go. Words matter. Keep ʻem coming.

  2. Eileen Cain's avatar Eileen Cain says:

    Mahalo, Gary. Why didn’t Governor Green veto this bill?

    Aloha, Eileen Cain, Honolulu

    • garyhooser's avatar garyhooser says:

      Good question Eileen. Good question. Perhaps the Governor…like the President…believes the ends justifies the means and even though the legality of this is questionable…and the lack of transparency and the political nature of the selection process is open to abuse…maybe the Governor thinks getting the money out to various organizations is worth cutting corners and skirting the law. I support 100% helping those organizations whose budgets have been cut by the federal government…so long as their books are otherwise in order AND the process for selection is impartial, based on clear criteria, and done in the sunshine…and not political in nature done behind closed doors. This type of selection system could and can still be set up if the Governor wanted to make that happen.

  3. Nai'a Newlight's avatar Nai'a Newlight says:

    Now, what?

    Aloha

    Nai`a NEWLIGHT

    Ha`iku

    • garyhooser's avatar garyhooser says:

      Hoping, wishing, pushing, and trying to get some legal minds wrapped around this. I support helping nonprofits who are being impacted by Trumps choices…it needs to done in the sunshine and via some “system” that strives to score and evaluate fairly those requesting the money…and I don’t think 4 politicians making the decisions behind closed doors is the way.

  4. reviewexuberant16eabc70c6's avatar reviewexuberant16eabc70c6 says:

    Somebody, (like the attorneys general) should explain to the president and the governor the important difference between “Defend the Constitution” and “Offend the Constitution.” Clearly they have a hard time with that.

  5. reviewexuberant16eabc70c6's avatar reviewexuberant16eabc70c6 says:

    Somebody, (like the attorneys general) should explain to the president and the governor the important difference between “Defend the Constitution” and “Offend the Constitution.” Clearly they have a hard time with that.

  6. Makana KHG's avatar Makana KHG says:

    I think Green has a bit of a bully in him; having been on the receiving end. I once deigned to posit in a SA letter that Gov’s Green at that time constant refrain that electing him meant was a good idea because by doing so we’d have “the first native Hawaiian first lady” was a rather meaningless gesture considering the position is an honorific and not one with any legal authority.

    That humble letter resulted in a SA op-ed by ex Gov. Abercombie (who mostly just insulted me when not inventing things I said out of whole cloth) and no less than four follow up letters to the editor all expressing the same sentiment. The SA did not of course deign to allow any response. It was quite an amusingly bombastic response to a very mild criticism from an absolute nobody.

    But Green did drop the line “first hawaiian first lady” line after that so suppose it had it’s effect.

    • garyhooser's avatar garyhooser says:

      Yes…I’ve been getting other email and texts from people who share similar experiences. The good news in my case is he also drew additional media attention to the legal and political flaws contained within the new law he was championing…

Leave a reply to Makana KHG Cancel reply