Title: What can we do, Gary?

I get the question every single day.

The question, of course, is “What can we do to make our government (island, state, world) a better place?”

I offer two suggestions, and I’ll expand on them here.

The first: Think globally, act locally.

The second: SHOW UP – at demonstrations, in the rooms, online, and at the ballot box.

Acting locally means starting at the County Council level.

Thinking globally and acting locally translates to County issues, including…

Agriculture: Ensuring food safety and production, regardless of tariffs, barge schedules, or national food laws/practices. This can be done via County land use requirements and tax incentives for food crops farmed with healthy, sustainable methods.

Law Enforcement: Protecting the Constitutional right of all County residents to due process, via agreements with federal authorities authorizing County support only when the federal actions follow County-specified legal guidelines.

Affordable Housing: Protecting a County resident’s right to sleep in a private car parked in a designated County-owned area when no other legal options for shelter exist in the County. Requiring by County ordinance that large employers who want land use zoning changes, and who use workers from outside the County, must provide additional housing for those workers, thus increasing existing housing inventories. The County could also amend property tax and land use policies to incentivize the development of affordable housing, paid for by absentee, foreign, corporate owners, the resort industry and others.

Environmental Protection: Via County land use and zoning ordinances, protecting sensitive areas like aquifers, shorelines, and coastal areas that may be at risk due to state or federal actions (or inactions).

These are just four areas in which County governments could significantly impact all of Hawai‘i, and even the planet. If all four Hawai’i Counties took similar action, the impact would be statewide… and as a model, even worldwide.

Fundamental political fact: Majority rules.

Passing any Hawai’i State law requires the approval of 13 State Senators, 26 Representatives, and the Governor.

A Council majority on Kaua`i is four.

FOUR Council-members have the power to change the laws within Kaua`i County. The Mayor is also needed to approve such change and/or a fifth member of the Council must be available to override a veto.

In other words, a total of 5 people must agree in order to change a law for Kaua`i County, versus 40 people for a State law.

For Maui, Hawai‘i County, and the City and County of Honolulu, the magic number is five, plus the Mayor… which means that for change to happen, six people must come to agreement.

Seems pretty obvious that getting 5 or 6 people onboard is much easier than trying to corral 40 to do the same thing.

So why aren’t we focusing more on making change happen via our County Councils?

True, the County area of responsibility and legal authority is narrower than that of State government, but the regulatory authority is still huge.

Creative County lawmakers can also develop “work-arounds.”

For example, the County may not have the power to tell farmers what they can and cannot grow — but they can leverage property tax authority by “use,” to incentivize healthy food crops grown for local consumption, and disincentivize unhealthy “factory farms.”

Similarly, the County may not have the power to legislate what restaurants can serve and sell — but they could provide a generous property tax incentive to those food establishments who commit in writing to serving and selling a minimum of X% locally grown agricultural products. The County already provides similar incentives to landowners who rent their residential properties at affordable rates.

Bottom line: We need to spend more time and energy focusing on our County Councils — acting locally, but thinking globally.

Gary Hooser
Former Kaua`i County Councilmember
Former Hawai‘i State Senator – Majority Leader
Presently retired and looking for good trouble-maker

Unknown's avatar

About garyhooser

This blog represents my thoughts as an individual person and does not represent the official position of any organization I may be affiliated with. I presently serve as volunteer President of the Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action (H.A.P.A.) www.hapahi.org I am the former Vice-Chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii. In another past life, I was an elected member of the Kauai County Council, a Hawaii State Senator, and Majority Leader, and the Director of Environmental Quality Control for the State of Hawaii - in an even earlier incarnation I was an entrepreneur and small business owner. Yes, I am one of the luckiest guys on the planet. Please visit my website AND sign up for my newsletter (unlike any email newsletter you have ever gotten, of that I am sure) - http://www.garyhooser.com/#four “Come to the edge.” “We can’t. We’re afraid.” “Come to the edge.” “We can’t. We will fall!” “Come to the edge.” And they came. And he pushed them. And they flew. - Christopher Logue (b.1926)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Title: What can we do, Gary?

  1. Richard Bodien's avatar Richard says:

    I truly appreciate your blogs and agree with just about everything you say, but usually with a caveat. Like today. Yes, we the people are less diluted at the county level, but our power is nonetheless diluted by big money that really drives the show behind the scenes.I have been thinking about this issue, at length, and have addressed it in several ways. Today I am going to address it in the context of the incrementalism of preserving the status quo in politics versus the necessity for major transformative change within our lifetime.I personally am old enough and ill enough not to care. The impacts of the current regime willl continue to be felt long after I am gone. But my personal values prevent me from not caring such that I continue to think and make noise. Here is todayʻs rant:

    Incrementalism or Transformation: The Battle for Democracy in a Corporate Age

    In the shadow of Citizens United v. FEC (2010), American democracy no longer belongs to the people—it belongs to capital. This Supreme Court decision, which equated corporate political spending with free speech, unleashed an era of dark money, Super PACs, and oligarchic influence over every level of government. The result is a nation where policy is often written by and for the wealthiest donors, not for the public good.

    Incrementalism—the favored strategy of establishment politicians—suggests that slow, measured reforms can reclaim democracy. It offers modest solutions: disclosure rules, ethics committees, small-donor incentives. But these tools are powerless in a system where billionaires can flood elections with unlimited cash, where corporate lobbyists write legislation, and where public trust erodes year after year.

    Incrementalism is not just insufficient—it is complicit. It preserves the status quo while pretending to challenge it. As long as the foundational structure remains untouched, the system continues to favor the wealthy and well-connected. The people may vote, but they do not govern.

    By contrast, transformative action recognizes that democracy is on life support—and demands emergency intervention. This means directly confronting the core legal fiction that corporations are people and money is speech. 

    At the national this means overturning Citizens United through a constitutional amendment or sweeping judicial reversal. 

    At the state level it means restoring meaningful public financing, outlawing dark money, and building new systems of democratic accountability rooted in community, not commerce. 

    At the County level it means leading by example and moving forward with progressive, pro-democracy, anti-corruption, non-corporate environmental and humanitarian values.

    Transformative change is hard—but necessary. The abolition of slavery, women’s suffrage, civil rights—all were dismissed as “impractical” until they became reality. The same must be true of a re-democratized America.

    We cannot tinker our way out of a captured democracy. We must break the machinery of corporate domination and build a system that is truly of, by, and for the people. Incrementalism prolongs decay. Transformation is the cure. If I were dentist I would pull the bad teeth, screw in some new teeth, fill in the decay, and brighten that smile to shine aloha, kuleana, and malama ʻāina on all of Hawaiʻi.

    The first step is to put Hawaiʻi First and the billionaires last. 

    Gratitude, 

    Richard

  2. hellaratty's avatar hellaratty says:

    I agree that citizens United is one of the worst things that ever happened to this country. I work for several years to try to get things changed at the state level. But everything just gets killed because money is too delicious to the politicians. Why do we not have more state ballot initiatives like public funding of elections or marijuana legalization? If this were a true democracy things like this should be decided by the people not just the politicians.

    • garyhooser's avatar garyhooser says:

      Unfortunately our State constitution does not give citizens the right to initiate ballot initiatives. Only the legislature has the power under the Hawaii constitution…to put something on the ballot for direct citizen approval or disapproval. Citizens in each County do have the power to change County laws directly via the citizen initiative process…but that can only be used on issues that fall within the County’s legal authority…so public funding of elections…is probably does not fall within that authority…ditto to marijuana…but I’m not a lawyer…and sometimes there are “work arounds” utilizing County laws to accomplish things that might normally not be within their legal purview.

      • hellaratty's avatar hellaratty says:

        it sounds like the people who wrote the constitution made sure to keep as much power as possible out of the hands of the people. Is there a way to amend the state constitution? I know that the state Congress won’t allow that at all. They don’t want to give us an inch.

      • garyhooser's avatar garyhooser says:

        Both the State constitution and the U.S. constitution can be amended but the process is difficult and yes, constitutions are normally made intentionally difficult to amend so that change comes only gradually.

Leave a reply to garyhooser Cancel reply