Given the current instability surrounding future federal funding of public schools, parks, university, medical services, and other vital programs, it’s completely inappropriate for Hawaiʻi legislators to accept the generous 35% to 48% pay raises proposed by the Salary Commission.
Each rank-and-file state legislator presently receives a $74,160 salary for the honor of serving as a part-time public servant. Legislators work only five months per year on a full-time basis, and as much (or as little) as they choose during the OTHER seven months of the year.
Per the US Census’ American Community Survey (ACS), the median salary for FULL-TIME workers in Hawaiʻi is $60,680. Other data sources report similar figures.
So, half of Hawaiʻi FULL-TIME workers earn $60,580 or less, while PART-TIME legislators now earn $74,160, AND they’ll be getting raises of 35% to 48% — unless they take action now and vote to reject that raise.
Legislators may also collect a state retirement pension after only 10 years of service, AND Neighbor Island legislators are paid an additional $225 per day during the 4 months of session; they’re not required to show actual expense receipts for this generous per diem allowance.
The decision to reject these pay raises would also prohibit the Governor’s office and Judiciary branch from receiving their pay increases recommended by the same Salary Commission.
It goes without saying that legislators, judges, and government executives should NOT be doing this work with expectations of big salaries. This work, after all, is public service.
Our legislature is faced with a decision: Either do nothing –thereby accepting the Salary Commission’s recommended pay raises without a vote — or “put the issue on the table,” which will mean holding public hearings and a public vote.
All indications point to the path of least resistance. They’ll likely keep their heads down and not hold any hearings or take any votes.
If pressed today on this matter, most legislators will point to the short time remaining in the legislative session. “It’s too late!” they’ll claim. “We don’t have time for the hearings necessary to reject the pay raises.”
Here’s the truth: Legislative rules could be waived, hearings could be held, and the session could be extended if needed.
Obviously, legislative leadership wants to avoid a public vote on this.
Why? Because a public hearing would overflow with furious residents asking angry questions and demanding justification. “You people want a RAISE when the federal government is firing park rangers, cutting school budgets, and denying states emergency funds???”
To be clear, there’s never a good time for politicians to give themselves a pay raise, either directly or indirectly.
But it’s hard to imagine a worse time than NOW.
President Trump and DOGE have been slashing and burning through almost every federal program on the books. Federal dollars that poured into Hawaiʻi public programs are being drastically reduced. We have an affordable housing crisis; we have families begging for help with school lunches and affordable early childhood programs; there are people sleeping under bridges…
“And you folks want a RAISE???”
Of course, the legislature could step up to the plate. They could actually begin working full-time, 12 months per year, and forgo their lucrative outside jobs. They could do any number of things to demonstrate the extra work they’d do to earn those raises — but so far, they haven’t.
No, it’s definitely not a good time to be giving yourself a raise.
Failing to hold a hearing, to have a public discussion, and to publicly vote on the issue does NOT give you cover to say, “But I didn’t actually give myself a raise”.
Please don’t insult us. We know how these things work.
Gary Hooser
former State Senator
former Councilmember
retired and trying my best to shine a light, and make some good trouble along the way

But look at the good side (sarcastic) it is not as bad as funding genocide enthusiastically!
You are right about that…and besides, it’s within the “biennial” framework for extended consideration. So as a practical matter, there’s all the time in the world. 😉
Rob Culbertson
I am going to disagree on this one. This should be a full time job with full time pay.
Letʻs say the cost of living in Hawaii is about $100,00 year. A legislator should be paid that much, less any outside income.
If they make a million from their PR firm, they get nothing. If they get $25,000 from Social Security, they get $75,000. Open it up so that working people, poor people, and retirees can participate in a meaningful way.
Mahalo,
Richard
I agree but they don’t want to require the job to be full time. So much more work could be done if they worked all year 40 hours per week. Instead the cram in everything over a 5 month period, and then do odds and ends meetings during the rest of the year. Some will do nothing, no work at all the rest of the year and some will work a lot. There is no requirement that they work full-time, even though they will be getting full time wages.
Changing that will go a long way to reducing corruption.
Put government back to work governing instead of politicking.
This is not about what they want. It’s about what the people need and deserve.